- From: John P. McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:07:38 +0200
- To: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAC5njqpS96y1iiX+Obd39WpepD9tDAvf8ToOs-xH4dqV_iQesg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, I went through the model and noted that while I believe we are very close there are still a number of open issues that we should look to resolve: Core: - In core there is now a 'SenseLexicon' class but no property to relate it any other elements in the model - We could/should consider using dct:language instead of ontolex:languageURI - We cannot give conditions when a Lexical Sense should apply (lemon had a condition property for this) - It would be useful to indicate when a mapping is dependent on the range or domain of a property (possibly) - Should we add subclasses of LexicalEntry as follows Word, MultiWordExpression, Affix? Syntax and Semantics - There is no property to indicate the conjugation (morphological pattern) of a word Variation - Lexical Variant is defined between either forms *or* lexical entries... there should be a class that is only for forms and a class that is only for entries - All variants are specified only in their 'reified' form, do we want to allow users to directly state variation between two entries (or forms or senses) with a single triple? - Are the Interlingual-/IntralingualVariant classes necessary? Metadata - There is no link between the metadata module and any other module in OntoLex - The Lexicon class is a duplicate of one already in the core - The language property is a duplicate of one defined in the core - ConceptualizedLinguisticResource is not used by any other part of module - The 'lexical link set' class and property are not used by any other part of the module - Several properties are named the same as classes except for the case of the first letter: resourceCoverage, language, lexicalLinkSet and lexicalization - Is the 'linguistic model' really required by every lexicalization? Regards, John
Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 18:08:05 UTC