- From: Thierry Declerck <declerck@dfki.de>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 12:36:27 +0200
- To: public-ontolex@w3.org
- Message-ID: <543A59AB.8060905@dfki.de>
Am 10.10.2014 20:07, schrieb John P. McCrae: > Hi all, > > I went through the model and noted that while I believe we are very > close there are still a number of open issues that we should look to > resolve: John, thanks for this! some of the points you mention were an issue for me as well. I am adding some few comments below. > > Core: > > * In core there is now a 'SenseLexicon' class but no property to > relate it any other elements in the model > Can then instances of "LexicalSense" be member of a SenseLexicon (and not only refer to ontologies outside of the Ontolex model? > > * We could/should consider using dct:language instead of > ontolex:languageURI > I am in favor of this move. > > * We cannot give conditions when a Lexical Sense should apply (lemon > had a condition property for this) > Yes I had this issue as well (the reason why I as attempting to use "ontolex:denotes") > > * It would be useful to indicate when a mapping is dependent on the > range or domain of a property (possibly) > * Should we add subclasses of LexicalEntry as follows Word, > MultiWordExpression, Affix? > Sounds reasonable to me. > Syntax and Semantics > > * There is no property to indicate the conjugation (morphological > pattern) of a word > True. I was missing this as well. > Variation > > * Lexical Variant is defined between either forms /or/ lexical > entries... there should be a class that is only for forms and a > class that is only for entries > * All variants are specified only in their 'reified' form, do we > want to allow users to directly state variation between two > entries (or forms or senses) with a single triple? > * Are the Interlingual-/IntralingualVariant classes necessary? > > Metadata > > * There is no link between the metadata module and any other module > in OntoLex > * The Lexicon class is a duplicate of one already in the core > * The language property is a duplicate of one defined in the core > * ConceptualizedLinguisticResource is not used by any other part of > module > * The 'lexical link set' class and property are not used by any > other part of the module > * Several properties are named the same as classes except for the > case of the first letter: resourceCoverage, language, > lexicalLinkSet and lexicalization > * Is the 'linguistic model' really required by every lexicalization? > Thanks! Thierry > Thierry Declerck, Senior Consultant at DFKI GmbH, Language Technology > Lab Stuhlsatzenhausweg, 3 D-66123 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 681 / 857 > 75-53 58 Fax: +49 681 / 857 75-53 38 email: declerck@dfki.de > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH > Firmensitz: Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern > Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster > (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: > Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 > -------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 12 October 2014 10:36:48 UTC