- From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:27:48 +0200
- To: public-ontolex@w3.org
- Message-ID: <543C35C4.2010602@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Hi John, thanks for the summary. I propose we discuss these issue during the telco this week. I will provide some examples for the metadata module as well. Regards, Philipp. Am 10.10.14 20:07, schrieb John P. McCrae: > Hi all, > > I went through the model and noted that while I believe we are very > close there are still a number of open issues that we should look to > resolve: > > Core: > > * In core there is now a 'SenseLexicon' class but no property to > relate it any other elements in the model > * We could/should consider using dct:language instead of > ontolex:languageURI > * We cannot give conditions when a Lexical Sense should apply (lemon > had a condition property for this) > * It would be useful to indicate when a mapping is dependent on the > range or domain of a property (possibly) > * Should we add subclasses of LexicalEntry as follows Word, > MultiWordExpression, Affix? > > Syntax and Semantics > > * There is no property to indicate the conjugation (morphological > pattern) of a word > > Variation > > * Lexical Variant is defined between either forms /or/ lexical > entries... there should be a class that is only for forms and a > class that is only for entries > * All variants are specified only in their 'reified' form, do we > want to allow users to directly state variation between two > entries (or forms or senses) with a single triple? > * Are the Interlingual-/IntralingualVariant classes necessary? > > Metadata > > * There is no link between the metadata module and any other module > in OntoLex > * The Lexicon class is a duplicate of one already in the core > * The language property is a duplicate of one defined in the core > * ConceptualizedLinguisticResource is not used by any other part of > module > * The 'lexical link set' class and property are not used by any > other part of the module > * Several properties are named the same as classes except for the > case of the first letter: resourceCoverage, language, > lexicalLinkSet and lexicalization > * Is the 'linguistic model' really required by every lexicalization? > > Regards, > John -- -- Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano AG Semantic Computing Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) Universität Bielefeld Tel: +49 521 106 12249 Fax: +49 521 106 6560 Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de Office CITEC-2.307 Universitätsstr. 21-25 33615 Bielefeld, NRW Germany
Received on Monday, 13 October 2014 20:28:18 UTC