Re: No ontolex telco today

Jorge, all,

   I do not have any major issues for the telco today, so I propose we 
cancel it and continue by email.

On your translation provenance example:

1) I would propose to remove the translation set in the example as it is 
confusing I think. The example is IMHO supposed to illustrate the usage 
of PROV-O to provide meta-information about a translation.

2) Actually, it is still true that the property "translationConfidence" 
is proprietary. I think we should include it into the vartrans module 
indeed.

3) Why do you use prov:qualified Generation instead of simply 
prov:GeneratedBy ???

Regards,

Philipp.


Am 14.11.14 16:19, schrieb Jorge Gracia:
> Hi Philipp, all,
>
> > OK, so what is the state of play of the provenance example?
>
> I added an example near the bottom of the "translation section" at 
> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Final_Model_Specification#Translation
> that we have not discussed yet.
>
> Regards,
> Jorge
>
> 2014-11-14 15:55 GMT+01:00 Philipp Cimiano 
> <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de 
> <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>>:
>
>     OK, so what is the state of play of the provenance example?
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Philipp.
>
>     Am 14.11.14 11:50, schrieb Jorge Gracia:
>>     Hi Philipp,
>>
>>     I'm happy to see that there was an agreement on vartrans. I
>>     volunteer to document it in the wiki and github if nobody else
>>     did it yet, although not in the next few days I am afraid (I am
>>     overwhelmed with other tasks!)
>>
>>     For me it is fine to discuss the provenance example by email. I
>>     am still not fully happy with so I would appreciate any comment
>>
>>     Regards,
>>     Jorge
>>
>>     2014-11-14 11:33 GMT+01:00 Philipp Cimiano
>>     <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>     <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>>:
>>
>>         Dear all,
>>
>>          there has not been much activity on the mailinglist this
>>         week. Further, I have no agenda points for today. I propose
>>         that we cancel today's telco.
>>
>>         I will work on the specification in the next weeks and hope
>>         that we can have a final specification until end of the year.
>>
>>         Jorge: can we discuss your provenance example via email?
>>
>>         Have a good weekend,
>>
>>         Philipp.
>>
>>         Am 09.11.14 21:17, schrieb Philipp Cimiano:
>>>         Jorge, ontolex members,
>>>
>>>          last Friday we had an very intense telecoference, see
>>>         minutes here:
>>>
>>>         As important milestones, we decided the following:
>>>
>>>         1) accept proposal 3B of Jorge mentioned in the email below.
>>>         With this we more or less conclude the work on the vartrans
>>>         module, for which we decided to keep the name (vartrans). We
>>>         still need to finish the discussion on representing
>>>         provenance of translations however (Jorge: are you going to
>>>         be available for the telco next week)
>>>
>>>         2) We discussed again the examples for the metadata module
>>>         provided by Armando and Manuel and agreed on them
>>>         essentially. We only discussed few things: whether a proxy
>>>         resource for a dataset is needed (it is needed to add
>>>         metadata essentially) and whether we need both a
>>>         ontolex:Lexicon (as lexicon object) and a lime:Lexicon (as
>>>         dataset).
>>>
>>>         3) We decided to have both integer and percentage properties
>>>         for the coverage in the lime module.
>>>
>>>         I think these are important milestones that conclude some of
>>>         the open discussion we have been having in the last months.
>>>
>>>         Talk to you all on the 14th to finalize other aspects of the
>>>         model.
>>>
>>>         Best regards,
>>>
>>>         Philipp.
>>>
>>>         Am 07.11.14 14:19, schrieb Jorge Gracia:
>>>>         Dear all,
>>>>
>>>>         After some internal discussions we are proposing (Elena,
>>>>         Lupe, and myself) the following to accommodate the new
>>>>         notion of a generic lexico-semantic relation in Lemon-Ontolex:
>>>>
>>>>         1) To add a generic "Lexico-semantic Relation"  to the CORE
>>>>         module (the name can be another one of course) for reifying
>>>>         relations whenever it is necessary, and having the "source"
>>>>         and "target" properties that we have discussed in the
>>>>         previous telcos. It is specialised in "Lexical Relation"
>>>>         whenever the relation is at the level of forms or lexical
>>>>         entries, and "Sense Relation" whenever the relation is
>>>>         between senses. The motivation of placing these in the core
>>>>         is to support ANY module that wants to reuse the same
>>>>         reification mechanisms.
>>>>
>>>>         Imágenes integradas 1
>>>>
>>>>         2)  Based on those classes, any type of specific relation
>>>>         could be supported. Now it is our choice whether to include
>>>>         them as a lemon module or as something external to the
>>>>         model. For instance, new relations could be defined:
>>>>         "Morphological derivation" (e.g., happy -> unhappy) at the
>>>>         lexical level or "Antonymy" at the sense level, for instance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         Imágenes integradas 2
>>>>
>>>>         3-A) Vartrans module: the Variant relation is proposed as a
>>>>         specialisation of "Lexico-semantic Relation". Roughly
>>>>         speaking, we understand "Variant" as a relation between two
>>>>         entities (lexical entries, forms, senses, ...) that are
>>>>         interchangeable under certain conditions, still keeping
>>>>         similar meanings (e.g., "finger" -> "hand" are not
>>>>         variants, but "color" -> "colour" or "bank"@en ->
>>>>         "banco"@es are variants). There are several subclasses of
>>>>         Variant:  "Lexical Variant" and "Translatable" are variants
>>>>         that are lexical relations as well, and "Terminological
>>>>         Variant" and "Translation" are variants that are also sense
>>>>         relations. See the figure for some examples...
>>>>
>>>>         Imágenes integradas 3
>>>>
>>>>         3-B) However one could say that any possible variant is
>>>>         covered already by the above referred subclasses "Lexical
>>>>         Variant", "Translation", "Terminological Variant", ... So
>>>>         another scheme without the "Variant" type is also possible,
>>>>         although loosing the notion of a relation between entities
>>>>         that are exchangeable under certain circumstances (which is
>>>>         given by "Variant").
>>>>
>>>>         Imágenes integradas 4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         I hope you find this reflections useful. Sorry we are not
>>>>         available today for discussing it, but any feedback or
>>>>         comment by email will be appreciated, and we can continue
>>>>         the discussion in the following telco.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>         Jorge, Elena, Lupe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         -- 
>>>>         Jorge Gracia, PhD
>>>>         Ontology Engineering Group
>>>>         Artificial Intelligence Department
>>>>         Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>>>>         http://jogracia.url.ph/web/
>>>
>>>         -- 
>>>         --
>>>         Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>>>         AG Semantic Computing
>>>         Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>>>         Universität Bielefeld
>>>
>>>         Tel:+49 521 106 12249  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249>
>>>         Fax:+49 521 106 6560  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%206560>
>>>         Mail:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de  <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>>>
>>>         Office CITEC-2.307
>>>         Universitätsstr. 21-25
>>>         33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>>>         Germany
>>
>>         -- 
>>         --
>>         Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>>         AG Semantic Computing
>>         Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>>         Universität Bielefeld
>>
>>         Tel:+49 521 106 12249  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249>
>>         Fax:+49 521 106 6560  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%206560>
>>         Mail:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de  <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>>
>>         Office CITEC-2.307
>>         Universitätsstr. 21-25
>>         33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>>         Germany
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Jorge Gracia, PhD
>>     Ontology Engineering Group
>>     Artificial Intelligence Department
>>     Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>>     http://jogracia.url.ph/web/
>
>     -- 
>     --
>     Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>     AG Semantic Computing
>     Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>     Universität Bielefeld
>
>     Tel:+49 521 106 12249  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249>
>     Fax:+49 521 106 6560  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%206560>
>     Mail:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de  <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>
>     Office CITEC-2.307
>     Universitätsstr. 21-25
>     33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>     Germany
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jorge Gracia, PhD
> Ontology Engineering Group
> Artificial Intelligence Department
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
> http://jogracia.url.ph/web/

-- 
--
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
AG Semantic Computing
Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
Universität Bielefeld

Tel: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 6560
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Office CITEC-2.307
Universitätsstr. 21-25
33615 Bielefeld, NRW
Germany

Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 13:59:53 UTC