Re: Finalizing the LIME module

Hi John,

  thanks, I agree with those changes that you propose.

Best regards,

Philipp.

Am 21.11.14 14:23, schrieb John P. McCrae:
> Hi Armando, Manuel, all,
>
> I was attempting to figure out the differences between the proposal 
> you guys sent for LIME and the version on the wiki. As I see it the 
> following alignment is what we roughly agree on:
>
> ConceptualizedLinguisticResource: Remove this class.
> LexicalLinkset: Not in proposal... I remain unconvinced that this is 
> really useful but it does not seem completely useless, let's keep it.
> LexicalizationSet: OK
> Lexicon: Merge with Ontolex module
> ResourceCoverage: Not in proposal, but OK.
> avgNumOfLexicalizations: 'avgNumOfEntries' in proposal, I think 
> lexicalizations is a clearer name
> class: As proposal
> language: Merge with Ontolex module
> lexicalEntries: OK
> lexicalLinkset: see above
> lexicalization: OK
> lexicalizations: Not in proposal but useful
> lexicalizedDataset: 'referenceDataset' in proposal (I prefer that name)
> lexicalizedReferences: Not in proposal but useful
> lexicon: OK (but we should consider a clearer name, e.g., lexiconDataset)
> linguisticModel: Called 'lexicalModel' in proposal (I prefer 
> linguistic). Note this should be an annotation property.
> percentage: OK
> references: Not in proposal but OK
> resourceCoverage: Called 'coverage' in proposal, we should keep this 
> as it is shorter and more distinct
> senses: Not in proposal but OK
>
> As such I attach what I would propose as a finalized version of Lime, 
> assuming you agree with what I stated above.
>
> Regards,
> John

-- 
--
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
AG Semantic Computing
Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
Universität Bielefeld

Tel: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 6560
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Office CITEC-2.307
Universitätsstr. 21-25
33615 Bielefeld, NRW
Germany

Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 14:01:10 UTC