W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Inverse property names

From: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:25:29 +0200
Cc: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@gmail.com>, public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7A78F1F9-9F0D-4629-BDC4-B144DC51C22A@gmail.com>
To: John McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Definitively in favor of systematic names, and definitely against names like "sememe" ;)
Aldo

On Jul 19, 2013, at 5:42:51 PM , John McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Quick show of interest in the induction of names for the inverse of existing properties: Do we wish to have systematic names for each inverse properties or distinct names. So for example
> 
> Systematic Names:
> 
> isContainedBy is inverse of contains
> isDenotedBy is inverse of denotes
> isReferenceOf is inverse of reference
> isSenseOf is inverse of sense
> isConceptOf is inverse of concept
> isEvokedBy is inverse of evokes
> 
> Distinct names (for example only):
> 
> member is inverse of contains
> lexicalization is inverse of denotes
> sememe is inverse of reference
> lexeme is inverse of sense
> entity is inverse of concept
> expression is inverse of evokes
> 
> Does anyone have strong opinions either way about this?
> 
> Regards,
> John
> <OntoLex Inverse.png>
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 18:26:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 10:57:30 UTC