W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Inverse property names

From: GUADALUPE AGUADO DE CEA <guadalupe.aguado@upm.es>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 19:51:54 +0200
To: <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <865a0eb4f0121568d4388d37ed3cee02@upm.es>
I agree with Aldo.
Very much in favour of systematic names
Thanks, John
Lupe

El 2013-07-19 20:25, Aldo Gangemi escribió:
> Definitively in favor of systematic names, and definitely against
> names like "sememe" ;)
> Aldo
> 
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 5:42:51 PM , John McCrae
> <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Quick show of interest in the induction of names for the inverse of 
>> existing properties: Do we wish to have systematic names for each 
>> inverse properties or distinct names. So for example
>> 
>> Systematic Names:
>> 
>> ISCONTAINEDBY is inverse of CONTAINS
>> ISDENOTEDBY is inverse of DENOTES
>> ISREFERENCEOF is inverse of REFERENCE
>> ISSENSEOF is inverse of SENSE
>> ISCONCEPTOF is inverse of CONCEPT
>> ISEVOKEDBY is inverse of EVOKES
>> 
>> Distinct names (for example only):
>> 
>> MEMBER is inverse of CONTAINS
>> LEXICALIZATION is inverse of DENOTES
>> SEMEME is inverse of REFERENCE
>> LEXEME is inverse of SENSE
>> ENTITY is inverse of CONCEPT
>> EXPRESSION is inverse of EVOKES
>> 
>> Does anyone have strong opinions either way about this?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> John <OntoLex Inverse.png>

-- 
GUADALUPE AGUADO DE CEA
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
Received on Saturday, 20 July 2013 17:52:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 10:57:30 UTC