Hi all, Quick show of interest in the induction of names for the inverse of existing properties: Do we wish to have systematic names for each inverse properties or distinct names. So for example Systematic Names: *isContainedBy* is inverse of *contains* *isDenotedBy *is inverse of *denotes* *isReferenceOf *is inverse of *reference* *isSenseOf *is inverse of *sense* *isConceptOf *is inverse of *concept* *isEvokedBy *is inverse of *evokes* * * Distinct names (for example only): *member *is inverse of *contains* *lexicalization *is inverse of *denotes* *sememe *is inverse of *reference* *lexeme *is inverse of *sense* *entity *is inverse of *concept* *expression *is inverse of *evokes* * * Does anyone have strong opinions either way about this? Regards, John
(image/png attachment: OntoLex_Inverse.png)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:33 UTC