W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > July 2013

Inverse property names

From: John McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:42:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAC5njqppxrDz-NvgeBsHJNXoiX32M+grBgEnCGaP_NvOu8G2WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Hi all,

Quick show of interest in the induction of names for the inverse of
existing properties: Do we wish to have systematic names for each inverse
properties or distinct names. So for example

Systematic Names:

*isContainedBy* is inverse of *contains*
*isDenotedBy *is inverse of *denotes*
*isReferenceOf *is inverse of *reference*
*isSenseOf *is inverse of *sense*
*isConceptOf *is inverse of *concept*
*isEvokedBy *is inverse of *evokes*
*
*
Distinct names (for example only):

*member *is inverse of *contains*
*lexicalization *is inverse of *denotes*
*sememe *is inverse of *reference*
*lexeme *is inverse of *sense*
*entity *is inverse of *concept*
*expression *is inverse of *evokes*
*
*
Does anyone have strong opinions either way about this?

Regards,
John


OntoLex_Inverse.png
(image/png attachment: OntoLex_Inverse.png)

Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 15:43:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 10:57:30 UTC