- From: John McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:42:51 +0200
- To: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 15:43:21 UTC
Hi all, Quick show of interest in the induction of names for the inverse of existing properties: Do we wish to have systematic names for each inverse properties or distinct names. So for example Systematic Names: *isContainedBy* is inverse of *contains* *isDenotedBy *is inverse of *denotes* *isReferenceOf *is inverse of *reference* *isSenseOf *is inverse of *sense* *isConceptOf *is inverse of *concept* *isEvokedBy *is inverse of *evokes* * * Distinct names (for example only): *member *is inverse of *contains* *lexicalization *is inverse of *denotes* *sememe *is inverse of *reference* *lexeme *is inverse of *sense* *entity *is inverse of *concept* *expression *is inverse of *evokes* * * Does anyone have strong opinions either way about this? Regards, John
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 15:43:21 UTC