W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-odrl@w3.org > November 2015

Re: W3C WG Update

From: Renato Iannella <renato@knowledgeflux.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 23:05:18 +0000
To: "public-odrl@w3.org Group" <public-odrl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3EBEAB6A-4352-4DB6-BAA2-D80FB33FE145@knowledgeflux.com>

On 5 Nov 2015, at 2:54 AM, Myles, Stuart <SMyles@ap.org<mailto:SMyles@ap.org>> wrote:

So, given this, and given that the at least some of the current implementations of ODRL 2.1 support JSON already, can we get the W3C to retain the existing format?

Does it make sense to then have two encodings? (one for JSON, and one for JSON-LD)

Or...Can we automatically serialise the JSON-LD from the ODRL OWL ontology?

Renato Iannella
Head of Innovation and Emerging Technologies, KnowledgeFlux
Level 7, 100 Edward St, Brisbane 4000 AUSTRALIA +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2015 23:05:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:35:35 UTC