Re: Core Model Clarification - Asset and Party

Hi Renato,

I do like your new definitions, and also agree with Stuarts suggestion of
keeping the old wording post "Furthermore".

A question on party - should we not stick to "legal entity"? Otherwise, the
license may not be enforceable (as a legal document, not technically).

Alapan

On Friday, September 5, 2014, Myles, Stuart <SMyles@ap.org> wrote:

>  Hi Renato,
>
>
>
> I think that both definitions are clearer and more helpful.
>
>
>
> An Asset may play a role in a Duty as well as within Permissions or
> Prohibitions. Currently, the full definition of Asset in the Core Model is
>
>
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-core-model-constraint-draft-changes/#section-22
>
>
>
> “The Asset entity is aimed at identifying the content that is the subject
> of an ODRL policy, e.g. a media file or ebook. Furthermore, it can be used
> to represent other Asset entities that are needed to undertake the Policy
> expression, such as with the Duty entity. The Asset entity is referred to
> by the Permission and/or Prohibition entities, and also by the Duty
> entity.”
>
>
>
> So, is your proposal to revise the first sentence (“The Asset … e.g. a
> media file or ebook”) and to keep the other parts of the paragraph
> (“Furthermore, … and also by the Duty entity”)? If so, then I think it
> covers the full scope.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Renato Iannella [mailto:ri@semanticidentity.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ri@semanticidentity.com');>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:18 PM
> *To:* ODRL Community Group
> *Subject:* Core Model Clarification - Asset and Party
>
>
>
> I would like to propose that we more clearly articulate what we mean by
> Asset and Party.
>
> Primarily so that audiences can understand the broad scope of ODRL policy
> expressions (which can then be narrowed, if required, in ODRL Profiles)
>
>
>
> 1 - Asset
>
>
>
> Currently defined as:
>
> "The Asset entity is aimed at identifying the content that is the subject
> of an ODRL policy, e.g. a media file or ebook"
>
>
>
> Proposed new definition:
>
> "The Asset entity is the subject of an ODRL policy expression that
> permissions and prohibitions are applied to. The Asset entity can be any
> form of identifiable resource, such as data/information, content/media,
> applications, or services."
>
>
>
> 2 - Party
>
>
>
> Currently defined as:
>
> "The Party entity is aimed at identifying a person, group of people, or
> organisation. The Party must identify a (legal) entity that can participate
> in policy transactions"
>
>
>
> Proposed new definition:
>
> "The Party entity is the object of an ODRL policy that performs (or not
> performs) actions or has a role in a Duty. The Party entity can be any form
> of identifiable entity, such as a person, group of people, organisation, or
> agent. An agent is a person or thing that takes an active role or produces
> a specified effect."
>
>
>
>
>
> Comments and feedback welcome...
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers...
>
> Renato Iannella
>
> Semantic Identity
>
> http://semanticidentity.com
>
> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
>
>
>
> The information contained in this communication is intended for the use
> of the designated recipients named above. If the reader of this
> communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that you have received this communication in error, and that any review,
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify The Associated Press immediately by telephone at +1-212-621-1898
> and delete this email. Thank you.
> [IP_US_DISC]
>
> msk dccc60c6d2c3a6438f0cf467d9a4938
>


-- 
Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------
Life's a gamble - take a chance