- From: Alapan <alapan@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:31:31 +0200
- To: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Cc: ODRL Community Group <public-odrl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACR6ppeW+q7zgRH26bnzH8xth9CxhJnNkRMFHqLG2L_gPWb9EQ@mail.gmail.com>
An example from my perspective on why multiple profiles may be useful. Say, you run an electronic multimedia store - games, movies, music, books etc. mtiple profiles would allow for different business models tailored for individual type of media - e.g. Books may be on a rental model while music may be on a purchase forever model. However, you may also wish to bundle media for special deals - e.g. A bundle with a movie, thesoundtrack, the novel which the movie is based in and the game based on the movie. Multiple profiles would allow or the expression of a single license covering all the profiles. The challenge is on conflicts; if book profile only allows for rental and music profile only allows for purchase, how is this resolved? I think multiple profiles should be allowed and conflict resolution should be an implementation decision. Alapan On Wednesday, July 2, 2014, Alapan <alapan@gmail.com> wrote: > ODRL 1 allowed for multiple profiles, I assume it really would depend on > deployment. > > On Wednesday, July 2, 2014, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ri@semanticidentity.com');>> wrote: > >> >> On 26 Jun 2014, at 04:03, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org> >> wrote: >> >> The 2.1 Date Model - >> http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-core-model-constraint-draft-changes/ >> - >> says in 2.1.2 about Profile “ …. If multiple ODRL Profiles are used, then >> all the rules from each Profile MUST apply to the policy expression.” >> This drives the assumption that multiple Profiles may be applied to a >> single policy. >> But in XML the @profile attribute may only appear once and it takes only >> a single value. (Also the first sentence of 2.1.2 leans towards “there is >> only one identifier”) >> >> This needs a decision: one or more profile(s) >> >> >> Does anyone have any strong positions? >> >> For greatest "flexibility" we started without any restrictions - allowing >> any number of profiles to be applied. >> In reality, it would be just one profile (if any) being used. >> >> (We can fix the XML with a space separated list of URIs, if required) >> >> Cheers... >> Renato Iannella >> Semantic Identity >> http://semanticidentity.com >> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 >> >> > > -- > Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Life's a gamble - take a chance > -- Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- Life's a gamble - take a chance
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 06:31:58 UTC