- From: Alapan <alapan@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:22:25 +0200
- To: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Cc: ODRL Community Group <public-odrl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACR6ppcMpbgbUyxD-0S=SCTfUon1Tj64S_w-y6Zo77OzR1hsow@mail.gmail.com>
ODRL 1 allowed for multiple profiles, I assume it really would depend on deployment. On Wednesday, July 2, 2014, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote: > > On 26 Jun 2014, at 04:03, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mdirector@iptc.org');>> wrote: > > The 2.1 Date Model - > http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-core-model-constraint-draft-changes/ > - > says in 2.1.2 about Profile “ …. If multiple ODRL Profiles are used, then > all the rules from each Profile MUST apply to the policy expression.” > This drives the assumption that multiple Profiles may be applied to a > single policy. > But in XML the @profile attribute may only appear once and it takes only a > single value. (Also the first sentence of 2.1.2 leans towards “there is > only one identifier”) > > This needs a decision: one or more profile(s) > > > Does anyone have any strong positions? > > For greatest "flexibility" we started without any restrictions - allowing > any number of profiles to be applied. > In reality, it would be just one profile (if any) being used. > > (We can fix the XML with a space separated list of URIs, if required) > > Cheers... > Renato Iannella > Semantic Identity > http://semanticidentity.com > Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 > > -- Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- Life's a gamble - take a chance
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 06:24:10 UTC