- From: Michael Steidl \(IPTC\) <mdirector@iptc.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:03:14 +0200
- To: "'Renato Iannella'" <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Cc: <public-odrl@w3.org>
Hi Renato, a human-readable/understandable rendition raises my concerns. A human has to translate the rights expressions of a party and they need an easy access to such vocabularies. Ok, you can create a stand-alone documentation about your vocabularies but this extends the efforts in maintaining the vocabs: update the machine readable rendition, update the human-readable documentation. Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Iannella [mailto:ri@semanticidentity.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 9:45 AM > To: Michael Steidl (IPTC) > Cc: public-odrl@w3.org > Subject: Re: Namespace of ODRL > > > On 14 Aug 2013, at 03:33, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org> wrote: > > > This implicitly requires that one MUST use an ontology editor/viewer to > > understand the structure of classes in a namespace, accessing only the URL > > would not help - as the URL of an IPTC vocabulary, e.g. > > http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/scene/, delivers all members. > > Hi Michael, are you concerned about the human-readable documentation > (eg, how a user can see the list of actions) > or the machine representation? > > Cheers... > Renato Iannella > Semantic Identity > http://semanticidentity.com > Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 15:03:51 UTC