Re: [LT-Web] A new version of the Terminology Annotation Showcase is published

Hi Marcis,
Looks good overall.

Comment on the API documentation:

Perhaps include a URL for where people can find the EurVoc codes. Will 
you need to reference a particular version in case future version of 
EurVoc and EuroTermBank get out of sync.

 From a quick glance EurVoc seems to have several levels, the lower 
levels being the terms themselves I presume. Perhaps you can add a few 
words explaining the relationship between the EurVoc domains and the 
EuroTermBank term base that you use (or perhaps just a link if this is 
available on the EuroTermBank web site).

Also, a small usability issue. On the upload dialogue, perhaps make the 
background to method tick boxes the same as that used on the returned 
document (orange and purple) - just to make that obvious at a glance.

One final thing, it would be helpful to have a few suggestions of 
perhaps EU documents that will throw up some good examples of matches to 
the term bank for when we showcase this.


On 27/05/2013 08:42, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> Hi Marcis,
> thank you for the reminder. There was no further comments on the API 
> from Davd, Yves or others. I looked at the documentation which was 
> good. As discussed offline I think we should convert at least the API 
> part or even more to an HTML version, and put at least the API part 
> under part of the usage scenarios document. We need to check where to 
> do that with Christian who is editing that document.
> All, I encourage you to look at the API asap if you intend to use it 
> in your workflows.
> Am 27.05.13 09:26, schrieb MÔrcis Pinnis:
>> Hi Felix,
>> We have reached the final week of May (and the final week to make 
>> some tweaks on our implementation).
>> I have updated the /TestSuite/ dashboard and it shows that we are 
>> conformant with the 55 test cases that we should address.
>> When we published the current version (on May 17), we kindly asked 
>> for feedback also on the API (and I believe Dave and Yves expressed 
>> the wish to take a look at the API). Has anyone had the chance to 
>> take a look at the API? As at the end of this week our part of the 
>> project officially ends, we would like to know if there are any 
>> issues left regarding the conformance to data standards that we 
>> should still try to address?
> From my side there aren't any issues left.
>> If not, we plan to finalise the development and prepare the final 
>> versions of the code, documentation, presentation.
> Sounds good to me, thanks a lot.
> Best,
> Felix

Received on Monday, 27 May 2013 11:20:35 UTC