- From: Karl Fritsche <karl.fritsche@cocomore.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:03:29 +0200
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, 'Silvia Pfeiffer' <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, 'Pēteris Ņikiforovs' <peteris.nikiforovs@tilde.lv>, <public-html@w3.org>
Hi, On 17.05.2013 00:15, Yves Savourel wrote: >> I'll try to go through the elements today and come with a possible >> list a ambiguous cases and proposed defaults. > Here it goes: > > Those three elements should probably be within-text='nested': <script>, <iframe>, <noscript> +1 > I would tend to say <textarea> may also be within-text='nested'. +1 > There are a few elements that are clearly within-text='yes' but may contain non-phrasing content. For example <select> can have <option>. So we end up with a non-within-text element inside a within-text element. I see two way to address those: > a) Do nothing. Just report each element as it is. > or b) Say that elements not within text that are inside of element within text must default as 'nested'. > I would tend to go for a) (not say anything). I also would tend to a as a default for the standard. But this is maybe something we can address further in a best practice document? > For all others I would default on within-text='yes', knowing that there are some occurrences where 'nested' would be better. Three elements especially: <math>, <svg> and <canvas> have good arguments to be within-text='nested', but I think we still would be better with defaulting to within-text='yes'. +1 Cheers Karl > > The bottom line is that for many elements there is no way 'right' choice. But overall it usually hurts less to have sub-flow text inside another flow than to have non-sub-flow text cut out from its context, so erring on within-text='yes' is probably better. > > -ys > > > >
Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 08:04:06 UTC