W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > May 2013

RE: [SPAM] RE: Question on "phrasing content" definition

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:15:25 -0600
To: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
CC: "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, 'PÄ“teris Å…ikiforovs' <peteris.nikiforovs@tilde.lv>, <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009601ce5282$de436d30$9aca4790$@com>
> I'll try to go through the elements today and come with a possible 
> list a ambiguous cases and proposed defaults.

Here it goes:

Those three elements should probably be within-text='nested': <script>, <iframe>, <noscript>

I would tend to say <textarea> may also be within-text='nested'.

There are a few elements that are clearly within-text='yes' but may contain non-phrasing content. For example <select> can have <option>. So we end up with a non-within-text element inside a within-text element. I see two way to address those:
a) Do nothing. Just report each element as it is.
or b) Say that elements not within text that are inside of element within text must default as 'nested'.
I would tend to go for a) (not say anything).

For all others I would default on within-text='yes', knowing that there are some occurrences where 'nested' would be better. Three elements especially: <math>, <svg> and <canvas> have good arguments to be within-text='nested', but I think we still would be better with defaulting to within-text='yes'.

The bottom line is that for many elements there is no way 'right' choice. But overall it usually hurts less to have sub-flow text inside another flow than to have non-sub-flow text cut out from its context, so erring on within-text='yes' is probably better.

Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 22:16:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:09 UTC