W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > May 2013

RE: Question on "phrasing content" definition

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 09:10:30 -0600
To: "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: 'Pēteris Ņikiforovs' <peteris.nikiforovs@tilde.lv>, <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, 'Mārcis Pinnis' <marcis.pinnis@tilde.lv>, <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000a01ce517e$582c9910$0885cb30$@com>
> I meant to say: ignore, i.e. "within-text=nested" for <script> and 
> the text within <script> doesn't even get classified as translatable 
> text, since it's code and not text to be translated.

I think Silvia has a good point about "within-text=nested".

so maybe:

[[
The default is "within-text=yes" all elements in phrasing content (http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/dom.html#phrasing-content-1), except for the <script> element which is "within-text=nested" independent of its position.
]]

-ys
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 15:11:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:09 UTC