- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:12:55 +0200
- To: Ankit Srivastava <asrivastava@computing.dcu.ie>, Dominic Jones <Dominic.Jones@scss.tcd.ie>, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie>, Clemens Weins <Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com>, Karl Fritsche <karl.fritsche@cocomore.com>, MÄrcis Pinnis <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>, 'Thomas Ruedesheim' <thomas.ruedesheim@lucysoftware.com>
- CC: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Dear various implementers again again, I'm not sure if you have seen this thread http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Apr/thread.html#msg64 a summary from Yves is here http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Apr/0124.html and the current thinking here http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Apr/0139.html it would be great to get your input on this. As written in below mail, we want to decide about this during this weeks Wednesday call. Thanks, Felix Am 16.04.13 09:48, schrieb Felix Sasaki: > Dear Ankit, Dom / Leroy, Clemens / Karl, Marcis, Thomas, > > we are currently discussing defaults for HTML5 processing. See the > current thinking at > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/HTML5_Defaults > > With this mail I want to check whether you will have the resources > needed for testing the defaults. This seems to be critical for > "Translate" and "Elements Within Text", since most of the tests here > have already been done. So re-doing the tests with defaults would mean: > 1) not providing new input files, no need to change these > 2) provide reference output files > 3) provide "your" output files > > I am putting Dom / Leroy into the loop as well, for the reference > output files. > > The proposed time line would be: > > - Decide on defaults within the next week, that is by 24 April > - Start testing with defaults before the Bled f2f. Discuss testing > issues in Bled > - Finalize the testing within May. > > Would that work for you timewise? If I don't hear back from you I'd > assume that this is OK. > > Note that this topic is important for other implementers as well (e.g. > Linguaserve), but we had discussed that already during last week's > call and I think we have the commitment already - let me know otherwise. > > Thanks a lot for you help in advance, > > Felix
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 12:13:37 UTC