- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 06:08:59 +0100
- To: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL58czpAZJYCatOPSjM4nyeK70USvtB=7LqC-i1ajZ6CEnogcw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dave, all, 2012/10/29 Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> > On 26/10/2012 19:12, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >> Wrt to your comments and ITS mechanisms: why use them at all? Why not >> specifying the mapping in general, e.g. in a separate profile of ITS "how >> to use ITS in XLIFF"? We then won't need to use any ITS mechanisms at all - >> an ITS implementation can use the mapping or not. >> >> Above answer may be not enough, let's take it from where. >> > Hi Felix, Yves, David, all, > I think having a separate profile has some distinct advantages. As we've > discussed in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-multilingualweb-** > lt/2012Oct/0307.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0307.html> > and > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-multilingualweb-** > lt/2012Oct/0310.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0310.html> > > it seem for some data categories (QualityIssue, Quality Precis, > transAgentProvenance, disambiguation, text analysis annotation/confidence > and mtconfidence), the main and possibly only use case for (ref)pointer > attribute is the XLIFF mapping case. For disambiguation the mapping to RDFa is another important use case, see http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-disambiguation-html5-rdfa so here we would need pointer attributes. > See yves example in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-multilingualweb-** > lt/2012Oct/0357.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0357.html> > > So if the _only_ use case for pointers in these data categories is > supporting the XLIFF mapping in this declarative manner, then supporting > the same in a separate ITS profile could help simplify these data > categories considerably. What do you think? > It seems that a lot of this depends on decisios in the XLIFF TC, as Yves wrote here http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0374.html So not sure - do we have to wait? Best, Felix > > cheers, > Dave > > > > > > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Monday, 29 October 2012 05:09:23 UTC