- From: Jörg Schütz <joerg@bioloom.de>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:39:24 +0100
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi Felix, My regrets, today I can't participate in the call. Sorry and cheers -- Jörg On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 06:22 (UTC+1), Felix Sasaki wrote: > Changes: > - Yves' mail about M2 added to test suite topic. May influence the M2 > characteristics. > - Further changes to the draft, need reviewer. > - toolsRef thread > - qi type feedback > > > Time: 26 November, 4 p.m. UTC. See > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Main_Page#Upcoming > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20121126T16 > > DIAL IN DETAILS: > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Dial_in_info_for_regular_call > > > 1) Test suite > Leroy et al. are only "managing" the test suite - data category owners > need to play an active role in checking and creating the files. Goal: > distribute related action items. Leroy, feel free to create a wish list > before the call of areas that want contributions and also people you'd > like to engage. > > Discussion on nature of M2, see > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Nov/0071.html > Question: which approach to choose for M2, see above mail. > > > 2) Drop localization quality precis > Not a lot of work has gone into this data category (e.g. action-295 > checking global rules example in localization precis is not done), and > the implementation commitment is thin. I propose to drop this from the > last call draft - implementors can do what Pedro et al. did with > "readyness". Once lq precis is stable it can go into the next version of > ITS. Thoughts? > > > 3) Issues > > 3.1) New issues > For the "last call" draft we need to be free of issues in the spec. > Please think hard about what could stop us from moving forward. > > 3.2) Closing ISSUE-42 tools information > Missing bit: tools information in global rules handling, see > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0194.html > Comments before the call are very welcome :) > Latest thread at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0203.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0204.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0205.html > > 4) Actions needed for the LC draft > > action-286 Put data category table into non-normative appendix in the spec > Shaun, can you get this done by 26 November, so that we have time for a > review? > > action-297 Address Query Language related Ed notes in draft > Jirka, same question. > Also related: do you think the update of the RELAX NG schema in sec. > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#its-schemas > will be in time? Should these schemas be normative then? > > action-314 Check global rules for provenance > done, see thread at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0189.html > Is there a need to make edits before the last call draft for this? > action-315 Rework > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/examples/xml/EX-provenance-global-3.xml > to use XLIFF > how does this related to action-314 and what edits are needed? > > action-308 update list of pointer attributes done, see > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#pointer-attributes-list > > action-311 check about harmonization of interval values. Done, see > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0191.html > question: and further action for last call draft needed? > > action-313 check data category overview table - will be done by Tuesday > > Reviewer for changes needed - see the changes described at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0202.html > > > 5) Editing calls Tue - Wed > It might make sense to have the 3-4 hours spend in this way: decide what > to edit, edit in parallel, review edits together. > > > 6) Stability of quality issue types > are the qi types stable to be implemented? Daniel Naber (language tool > developer) is asking. See further feedback here > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0206.html > > > 7)AOB > > > 8) EU PROJECT SPECIFIC (but no secrets, everybody feel free to stay) > > presentations and public outreach - input needed for M12 report - work > package sanity check. > > - Felix >
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 13:39:20 UTC