- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:14:29 -0400
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
What do we do about the statement in XML 1.0 that names beginning wiht "xml" (in any case combination) are reserved for future standardization? So far, we only have xml:*, xmlns, and xmlns:* in the XML stack in element and attribute names and xml-style and xml-model PI targets. Change control for these resides with the W3C XML Core WG. They have been very useful as an extension point: anyone who uses a name beginning with "xml" for private purposes deserves to lose and need not be worried about. Shall we put a similar remark into the MicroXML spec? -- Note that nobody these days would clamor for fundamental laws John Cowan of *the theory of kangaroos*, showing why pseudo-kangaroos are cowan@ccil.org physically, logically, metaphysically impossible. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Kangaroos are wonderful, but not *that* wonderful. --Dan Dennett on zombies
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 21:14:50 UTC