- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:28:01 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua0q5_MNyqFbGgFs4GZ0z0X4FphGGW-auh8o-ZkEDcOL+Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:14 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > What do we do about the statement in XML 1.0 that names beginning wiht > "xml" (in any case combination) are reserved for future standardization? > So far, we only have xml:*, xmlns, and xmlns:* in the XML stack in > element and attribute names and xml-style and xml-model PI targets. > Change control for these resides with the W3C XML Core WG. They have been > very useful as an extension point: anyone who uses a name beginning with > "xml" for private purposes deserves to lose and need not be worried about. > > Shall we put a similar remark into the MicroXML spec? > +1 I'll admit my biggest cause for bias: this restriction is essential to the workings of Amara's generic, schema-free data binding system (bindery), which is a system I expect to port to MicroXML. -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 21:28:29 UTC