- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:13:32 -0400
- To: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
Uche Ogbuji scripsit: > Why don't we start with Option A? We could possibly reconsider the > other options in later iterations of the spec, whereas it would be > trickier to go the other way. That said, I'm more at peace with the > idea of just banning all colons in all names than I was yesterday. At > least I find it much less worrisome than a major break of XMLNS 1.0 > compatibility. On reflection, I'd like to see option A-prime, in which colons are not allowed except in the form "xml:something". This has no namespace issues and preserves compatibility with XML 1.0 NS, but allows the standard attributes to still work. > OT: There is a long line of arguent that the best solution to the > problem namespaces tackled is some variation on architectural forms. > I wonder if we'll envision some MicroAF, maybe based on the Cowan or > Tennison proposal, If it's based on my proposal, it would have to be simplified a lot. -- I could dance with you till the cows John Cowan come home. On second thought, I'd http://www.ccil.org/~cowan rather dance with the cows when you cowan@ccil.org come home. --Rufus T. Firefly
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 21:13:54 UTC