- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:47:13 +0200
- To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
- CC: 'Yves Raimond' <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
> If the task is about searching content of interest through different > angles reflected by the ontology properties across different > namespaces linked to ma-ont through mapping, then I interpret from > your response that FULL should maybe not be used to maximise > searchability resulting in more positive accurate hits. I'm sorry, you mis-interpret me. I'm thinking all the contrary. I do think that OWL Full is not a problem for the Ontology for Media Resources. The way I will use the ontology is indeed to enable search cross metadata formats and vocabulary. I care about getting accurate results (but this will naturally be the case whatever OWL flavors you use) and I don't care getting ALL results. I might anyway get all results if the only OWL Full feature used is punning, which reasoners such as Racer handles very well. OWL2 RL is also a good candidate. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2010 11:51:51 UTC