- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:37 +1000
- To: tmichel@w3.org
- Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTinx5o8G-ejU1K9hCA5ZcHxXjVb0xngC+WGc_D9m@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Thierry, I saw the two sections and my reply was indeed targeted at the container format section. As I said: skeleton should be regarded as part of the container format and because Skeleton includes metadata, it should be counted (see http://github.com/cpearce/OggIndex/blob/master/Skeleton-4.0-Index-Specification.txt). My point was that all of the information you are after is already included in the previous table everywhere where it says "skeleton". Anyway, happy to help - here is the table: <table class="ta20" border="1"> <tbody> <tr class="ro-header"> <th class="col-mawg">MAWG</th> <th class="col-relation">Relation</th> <th class="col-attribute">OGG</th> <th class="col-how">How to do the mapping</th> <th class="col-datatype">Datatype</th> <th class="col-xpath">XPath</th> </tr> <tr class="ro-header"> <td class="ma" colspan="6">Descriptive Properties (Core Set)</td> </tr> <tr class="ro-header"> <td class="col-mawg" colspan="6"><em>Identification</em></td> </tr> <tr class="ro-even"> <td class="ma">ma:identifier</td> <td>exact</td> <td>Name</td> <td>Name field in skeleton header (new)</td> <td>String</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr class="ro-header"> <td class="col-mawg" colspan="6"><em>Content description</em></td> </tr> <tr class="ro-even"> <td class="ma">ma:description</td> <td>related</td> <td>Title</td> <td>Title field in skeleton header (new)</td> <td>String</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr class="ro-header"> <td class="col-mawg" colspan="6"><em>Technical Properties</em></td> </tr> <tr class="ro-even"> <td class="ma">ma:frameSize</td> <td>N/A at container level</td> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr class="ro-odd"> <td class="ma">ma:compression</td> <td>exact</td> <td>Content-type</td> <td>Content-type field of Skeleton header</td> <td>MIME type</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr class="ro-even"> <td class="ma">ma:duration</td> <td>exact</td> <td></td> <td>calculate as duration = last_sample_time - first_sample_time of OggIndex header of skeleton</td> <td>Float (or rather: rational - rational)</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr class="ro-odd"> <td class="ma">ma:format</td> <td>exact</td> <td>Content-type</td> <td>Content-type field of Skeleton header</td> <td>MIME type</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr class="ro-even"> <td class="ma">ma:samplingRate</td> <td>exact</td> <td></td> <td>calculate as granulerate = granulerate_numerator / granulerate_denominator of Skeleton header</td> <td>Rational (or rather int / int)</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr class="ro-odd"> <td class="ma">ma:frameRate </td> <td>exact</td> <td></td> <td>calculate as granulerate = granulerate_numerator / granulerate_denominator of Skeleton header</td> <td>Rational (or rather int / int)</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr class="ro-even"> <td class="ma">ma:averageBitRate</td> <td>exact</td> <td></td> <td>calculate as bitrate = length_of_segment / duration from OggIndex headers of skeleton</td> <td>Float</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr class="ro-odd"> <td class="ma">ma:numTracks</td> <td>N/A on container level</td> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Cheers, Silvia. On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > Silvia, > > I think you are misunderstanding/missing what we have decided during our > last F2F in Sophia. > > Your contribution is still included in the latest draft of the Ontology > specification > > > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#d0e8203 > > Your OGG table is included in the following section > 5.2.2 Multimedia metadata formats mapping tables > > but we have created a new section for > 5.2.3 Multimedia container formats mapping tables > > where we have added these containers: 3gp, flv, mov, mp4, ogg, webm > > Feel free to update the OGG container table, if you have expertize on this > container, > the file is at: > > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mappings/container-OGG.htm > > Thierry. > > > > > > > Le 21/09/2010 14:55, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : > > I think you misunderstand some of the way in which Ogg works. Skeleton is >> actually part of the container format and thus all the metadata that >> skeleton supports has to be attributed to Ogg. See: >> >> http://github.com/cpearce/OggIndex/blob/master/Skeleton-4.0-Index-Specification.txt >> >> May I ask what happened to the Ogg mapping table that I previously >> contributed and why that is not being used? I have contributed a mapping >> table for Ogg files, which I think is now at >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#d0e8203 >> . >> It includes the skeleton metadata, which should be counted as >> container-level metadata. >> >> Cheers, >> Silvia. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >> >> >>> I have investigated into the OGG container to fill our OGG mapping table >>> [1] >>> >>> Ogg does not know anything about the content it carries and leaves it to >>> the media mapping of each codec to declare and describe itself. There is >>> no >>> meta information available at the Ogg level about the content tracks >>> encapsulated within an Ogg physical bitstream. >>> >>> read more at >>> http://www.xiph.org/ogg/doc/skeleton.html >>> >>> >>> >>> Ogg does not replicate codec-specific metadata into the mux layer in an >>> attempt to make the mux and codec layer implementations 'fully >>> separable'. >>> Things like specific timebase, keyframing strategy, frame duration, etc, >>> do >>> not appear in the Ogg container. The mux layer is, instead, expected to >>> query a codec through a centralized interface, left to the >>> implementation, >>> for this data when it is needed. >>> >>> Though modern design wisdom usually prefers to predict all possible needs >>> of current and future codecs then embed these dependencies and the >>> required >>> metadata into the container itself, this strategy increases container >>> specification complexity, fragility, and rigidity. >>> >>> read more at >>> http://www.xiph.org/ogg/doc/oggstream.html >>> >>> Therfore I guess there is not much to fill in our OGG mapping table. >>> >>> Thierry >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#d0e12764 >>> >>> >>> >>
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 14:01:37 UTC