Response to your LC Comment -2393 on Media Ontology spec

Dear James,

In your latest email to the MAWG response to your comment, you seem to 
disagree with the MAWG proposal.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0245.html

"I don't agree with the statement that speex or VP8 are not metadata
formats.  They are audio and audiovisual media formats which contain
both metadata and data in their specifications.
This disagreement can be resolved if speex and VP8 are included in the
media ontology".

The group is currently discussing your objection. Speex is an audio
format, and the Ontology spec is mainly incorporating images and video 
metadata formats.

To move forward,  could you please send the MAWG the 2 mapping tables 
for Speex and VP8.

Please use as template the following tables with the exact name of the 
property being mapped to, like ma:identifier, ma:title, etc.
and the same columns: Relation, How to do the mapping, Datatype, 
Required vs Optional,XPath

templates:
http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#metadata-mapping-table

Could you please send these ASAP as we are about to release a new 
publication of the  Media Ontology spec



Best regards,
Thierry Michel

Received on Monday, 11 October 2010 16:54:36 UTC