Re: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2010-12-21

Dear all,

I will be on holidays next week, so will not be able to attend the  
telecon; I will try to find a way to connect to IRC but I can't  
promise anything. As for the next F2F meeting, I will change job in  
February, so I will not be able to attend the meeting either, my  
apologies. I will unfortunately not be able to represent to VU  
University anymore in the future, and will have to discuss the  
transition with my current and future employers.

Best,
Véronique
PS: my emails to the list do not get posted anymore because of an  
email change at the VU University, do you know who can subscribe my  
new VU email address tot he list? Or can I do it myself?


> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Joakim Söderberg
> Sent: samedi, 11. décembre 2010 17:41
> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2010-12-21
>
> Dear all,
> Decision by majority vote suggests that the next teleconference will  
> be on December 21st
>
> As already announced, we will focus on the proposed updates to the  
> abstract ontology, and resolve open action items in order to publish  
> the ontology doc on a second last call. Please have a look at your  
> (new and old) open actions. For example we are missing LC comment  
> reviews from Daniel (a-334,343), Wonsuk (a-328) and Jean-Pierre  
> (a-348).
>
> Best Regards
> /Joakim
>
>
> -------------------------------
> 1. Convene
> Media Annotations WG
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") Alternative  
> dial numbers:
> France (Nice): +33.4.26.46.79.03
> UK (Bristol) : +44.117.370.6152
> IRC channel: #mediaann
> Tuesday 2010-12-21 12:00-13:00 UTC, (ie, Amsterdam, Paris, Stockholm  
> 13:00)
> Regrets: Tobias
> Chair: Joakim
> Scribe: TBA
>
> Minutes to appear: http://www.w3.org/2010/12/21-mediaann-minutes.html
> Propose to accept F2F minutes: http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-mediaann-minutes.html
>
> 2. Next meeting
> TBA (2011)
>
> 3. Items
> [A] Action items:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
>
> [B] Discuss the set of changes to the (abstract) Ontology,  
> summarized here by Jean-Pierre:
>
> PART I
> 1) It is proposed to add track as a sub-class of fragment to help  
> aligning with MFWG
> 2) It is proposed to add videoTrack and audioTrack to which  
> currently existing specialised properties like frameRate or  
> sampleRate will be more specifically linked as well as a better use  
> of the compression property
> 3) It is proposed to add captioningTrack to better align with MFWG  
> and also to address subtitling more properly
>
> 4) It is proposed to change createDate (or creationDate) as "date"  
> and list createDate (or creationDate) at the same level as  
> releaseDate, etc.  This allows better hierarchical representation of  
> dates in the RDF ontology as, for example, releaseDate cannot be  
> considered as a subclass of createDate?
>
> 5) RatingValue should be float but it should now have been corrected  
> in the API following today review of actions.
>
> 6) language and compression should allow string but also anyURI  
> values, which would allow using SKOS concepts from classification  
> schemes
>
> PART II
>
> 1) We are not providing any information about signing, which is  
> definitely important for accessibility
> 2) We are not providing very detailed information on captioning
> 3) I would therefore propose for discussion tomorrow the addition of  
> signing and a number of properties such as the ‘purpose’ (is signing  
> or captioning there for translation, subtitling, audio description,  
> etc.), the language used (valid for signing as well as captioning)  
> and maybe an attribute like closed vs. open signing or captioning
>
> [C] Follow up on Implementation of LC comments
>
> 1- Media Ontology spec
>
> -- LC Comment -2405:  JP Evain:
> Introduction
> -          Note to implementers, content authors - not really  
> explicit, maybe these roles should be mentioned saying things like  
> "it is expected that implementers will do."  ". to the benefit of  
> content providers", etc.
>
> -          There is no section 1.1 on the purpose of the  
> specification (yet)
>
> Section 4.1 core property definitions -> now section 5.1
> -          The ma: prefix still appears in the table but since the  
> comment was made Pierre Antoine, while working on the mapping table  
> suggested that the prefix should only be used with the ma-ont  
> namespace in the RDF -> reconsider position?
>
> Section 4.2.2 - no change as explained in previous response - tables  
> in line -> now 5.2.2
>
> Joakim: "our specification" is replaced by "this  
> specification" (OK), But "our Ontology" (two occurrences in section 1)
>
> Other comments from JP review
>
> The abstract and introduction should mention the definition of the  
> RDF ontology and the mapping table that will come with it.
>
>
> -- LC Comment -2389 : NO - partially implemented http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0086.html
>
> -- LC Comment -2404 : NO - partially implemented http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0093.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0085.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0094.html
>
>
> -- LC Comment -2418: NO - partially implemented (Edits are missing)  
> see edits athttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0073..html
>
> ____________
>
> 2- Media API spec
>
> -- LC Comment -2406 : NOT reviewed
>
> -- LC Comment -2419 : NO partially implemented http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0090.html
>
> -- LC Comment -2410 : OK But Chris must add Véronique's edits see  
> edits at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0107.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0106.html
>
>
>
> [D] reminder : Metadata examples needed!
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0081.html
>
> During the F2F in Lyon, we decided to verify our mapping ontology by  
> having metadata in each format AOB
>
>
> Best Regards
> /Joakim
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************** This email and  
> any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely  
> for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system  
> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has  
> been swept by the mailgateway  
> **************************************************
>