- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 17:03:57 -0700
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
At 20:36 +0100 5/05/09, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>I'm not sure that I agree with the idea of having a value for property X
>*at each instant*...
>
>Back to your copyright example: for me, the copyright is on a whole
>media entity, spanning from T to T', even if embeded in a bigger one. It
>does not feel right to state that at time T", the copyright is C, just
>like it would not feel right to state that the copyright of a book (or
>its author, or its title) is the copyright (author, title, resp.) for
>each and every word of the book.
>
> pa
I think we are agreeing, in fact. If I ask a
question about a specific time, that falls into a
range T to T' as you say, and the system can
answer. If I ask a question that spans a range
of times (or implicitly, all possible times) then
there may be a plurality of answers...
>
>David Singer a écrit :
>> At 22:02 +0100 4/05/09, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I agree with David that "my favourite scenes" is neither 'intrinsic' not
>>> 'published'. I also agree to call that 'user' metadata, and would point
>>> out that our use case 5.6 [1] is exactly about that.
>>>
>>> But the properties proposed by Felix are not, IMO, limited to user
>>> generated metadata. Some videos are complex, and different fragments may
>>> have different intrinsic or published metadata. A canonical example is a
>>> news report, which is a composite media object comprising several parts.
>>> Both the whole report and each part deserve theit own metadata
>>> (intrinsic and published), but it should be possible to express the
>>> relation between the whole and the parts.
>>
>> right, time-variant metadata is a big question. Most annotation/metadata
>> systems think of it as time-invariuant ('applies to the whole
>> resource'). However, some things are better time-variant (e.g. the
>> copyright owner of a movie assembled from pieces might vary by piece).
>>
>> It's easy to design an interface "at time T in this movie, what is the
>> answer to X" and have the reply be "at any time, the answer is Y"
>> (time-invariant label). It's harder to answer "what is the answer to X"
>> with "well, that depends on what time in the movie you ask about".
>>
>> worth pondering...
>>
>>>
>>> pa
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-annot-reqs-20090119/#uc-user-generated-metadata
>>>
>>>
>>> Felix Sasaki a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2009/5/5 David Singer <singer@apple.com <mailto:singer@apple.com>>
>>>>
>>>> At 7:14 +0200 2/05/09, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>>>>
>>>> List of my favorite scences of a video, as part of the video
>>>> metadata? Does that not make sense?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh wow, this is a new category of metadata.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is it so new? At least the mechanisms listed in the media fragments
>>>> draft seem to exist for some time. So my assumption was that the
>>>> mechanisms are actually used, and that mapping betweeen them is useful.
>>>> If they exist only as a new category, to be filled by the new fragment
>>>> identifier syntax defined by the media fragments WG, than it does not
>>>> make sense to invest time in their mapping.
>>>>
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So far I have been seeing
>>>>
>>>> * 'intrinsic' properties of the media itself (duration, whether it
>>>> has video, audio etc.)
>>>> * published annotations for the media (copyright, title, etc.)
>>>>
>>>> both of these are 'source supplied'.
>>>>
>>>> 'My favorite scenes' is user-supplied. Hm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> David Singer
>>>> Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>>> Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
>>> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
>>>
>>> Attachment converted: DaveG49:signature 311.asc ( / ) (00219A47)
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
>
>Attachment converted: DaveG49:signature 313.asc ( / ) (0021A1B4)
--
David Singer
Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 00:06:37 UTC