- From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:38:21 +0900
- To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
- Cc: Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>, Matthias Einbrodt <meinbrodt@gmx.net>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <ba4134970907070238m1249e613o4b032167a2da0abf@mail.gmail.com>
ah, thanks! Sorry for missing this. Felix 2009/7/7 Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at> > We started discussing these things at the F2F, you can find the notes on > the API at > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Strawman_API_design_and_notes > > > > Best regards, > > Werner > > > > *Von:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto: > public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] *Im Auftrag von *Felix Sasaki > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 07. Juli 2009 10:54 > *An:* Veronique Malaise > *Cc:* Matthias Einbrodt; public-media-annotation@w3.org > *Betreff:* Re: Capturing the information about the creator of a collection > or a feed within the Media Ontology > > > > Good approach. For the API, I think keeping the number of methods small > (e.g. one property = one method) would be good too. To capture the > differences you mention one could create different signatures, e.g. > getAuthor(mediaResourceURI) > getAuthor(mediaResourceURI,COLLECTIONAUTHOR) > with COLLECTIONAUTHOR being a constant for the roles. In that way, the user > of the API has both options: getting just all author information (first > method call) or only a specific one (second call). > > Felix > > 2009/7/7 Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl> > > Hello, > > > > The idea of the "core properties" of the Media Ontology is that they should > be useful in several use cases, and that they are supported by different > standards and vocabularies. We had a vote to select them, based on the most > frequent properties present in the mapping table. The creator of a > collection can indeed be mapped to ma:author, with a property specifying > that the meaning or scope of "collection author" is narrower than the one of > ma:author (and potentially *how* narrower it is). The idea is to integrate > the mapping modularity from a specific vocabulary to the ma list, not to > extend the core list itself. > > > > Best regards, > > Véronique > > > > On Jul 6, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Matthias Einbrodt wrote: > > > > Hello, > > I thought a little about the idea of capturing the information about the > creator of a collection or a feed within the Media Ontology. > > To date there is actually no element within the Media Ontology that could > capture such information. A collection or feed creator property could be > mapped to the ma:author property but that would cause overlaps with the > values for the creator or authors of singe media entities (videos, images > etc.) and thus it would not be possible to search for a creator of a > collection specifically. > > Therefore I want to discuss the idea of introducing a distinct Media > Ontology property for the creators of collections / feeds / playlists. > > A possible use case where such a property might valuable can be found > within the Youtube context for example where users can create several feeds > and playlists and somene might be interested to search for the playlists / > feeds of a certain user because he is known to create very popular and liked > playlists. > > I’m looking forward hearing your opinions. > > Best regards > > Matthias Einbrodt > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 09:39:02 UTC