public-json-ld-wg@w3.org from June 2019 by author

Benjamin Young

• [Agenda] JSON-LD Teleconference 2019-06-28 (Thursday, 27 June)
• [Agenda] JSON-LD Teleconference 2019-06-21 (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: Do we have a call? (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: Do we have a call? (Friday, 21 June)
• [Agenda] JSON-LD Teleconference 2019-06-14 (Friday, 14 June)

Dave Longley

• Re: [Agenda] JSON-LD Teleconference 2019-06-07 (Friday, 7 June)

David Newbury

• Re: [Agenda] JSON-LD Teleconference 2019-06-28 (Thursday, 27 June)

Fabian Steeg

• Tests for merging rootless base URL paths (Monday, 3 June)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Question about JSON-LD: @type in expanded term definitions in @context (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Question about JSON-LD: @type in expanded term definitions in @context (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: Question about JSON-LD: @type in expanded term definitions in @context (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Relative URI references: interoperability problems (Monday, 10 June)
• Question about JSON-LD: @type in expanded term definitions in @context (Monday, 10 June)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Question about JSON-LD: @type in expanded term definitions in @context (Monday, 10 June)

Ivan Herman

• [Minutes] 2019-06-28 (Friday, 28 June)
• [Minutes] 2019-06-21 (Friday, 21 June)
• Do we have a call? (Friday, 21 June)
• [Minutes] 2019-06-14 (Friday, 14 June)
• [Minutes] 2019-06-07 (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/json-ld-syntax] Unexpected @type scope behavior (term definitions persist throughout JSON tree) (#174) (Saturday, 1 June)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: Question about JSON-LD: @type in expanded term definitions in @context (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Question about JSON-LD: @type in expanded term definitions in @context (Tuesday, 11 June)

Robert Sanderson

• Re: Do we have a call? (Friday, 21 June)
• [Agenda] JSON-LD Teleconference 2019-06-07 (Friday, 7 June)

Simon Steyskal

• Re: [Agenda] JSON-LD Teleconference 2019-06-07 (Friday, 7 June)

Last message date: Friday, 28 June 2019 17:33:39 UTC