- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:17:46 +0000
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>, public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Friday, 18 March 2022 08:27:51 UTC
> They also observe that GLR is harder to implement than The. Scott, Johnstone, and Hussain published “Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers” (2000)[*] which discusses some weaknesses in Tomita’s original algorithms and goes on to describe a “Generalised reduction modified LR parser” which they express in about a page of code. (A page of somewhat dense code festooned with symbols, but that’s not wholly unlike the page or so I implemented for my current parser.) The prospect that a DFA based parser might create fewer objects and consequently put less GC pressure on the JVM does inspire me to consider attempting it. But not *this* weekend. > Earley crucial point, is probably one Tom made already: new > implementations of ixml are always welcome! Indeed! Be seeing you, norm [*] You will have no trouble finding it, though I cannot work out what a canonical location might be, so I’m leaving it to your search engine of choice. -- Norm Tovey-Walsh Saxonica
Received on Friday, 18 March 2022 08:27:51 UTC