- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:17:46 +0000
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>, public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Friday, 18 March 2022 08:27:51 UTC
> They also observe that GLR is harder to implement than The.
Scott, Johnstone, and Hussain published “Tomita-Style Generalised LR
Parsers” (2000)[*] which discusses some weaknesses in Tomita’s original
algorithms and goes on to describe a “Generalised reduction modified LR
parser” which they express in about a page of code. (A page of somewhat
dense code festooned with symbols, but that’s not wholly unlike the page
or so I implemented for my current parser.)
The prospect that a DFA based parser might create fewer objects and
consequently put less GC pressure on the JVM does inspire me to consider
attempting it. But not *this* weekend.
> Earley crucial point, is probably one Tom made already: new
> implementations of ixml are always welcome!
Indeed!
Be seeing you,
norm
[*] You will have no trouble finding it, though I cannot work out what a
canonical location might be, so I’m leaving it to your search engine of
choice.
--
Norm Tovey-Walsh
Saxonica
Received on Friday, 18 March 2022 08:27:51 UTC