FW: Report on Meeting with Prof. Quejingzhabu

Hi Kamal,
Could you look at the DS01 document that was just sent out to the group – the items in grey highlighting.
I am looking for consensus on all of these items.
If you could pass us your agreement per item or non-agreement and reasoning behind it – that would be very helpful.
Thanks,
Greg


From: Mansour, Kamal [mailto:Kamal.Mansour@monotype.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 9:27 AM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
Subject: Re: Report on Meeting with Prof. Quejingzhabu

Hi Greg,

Please refer me to the specific items on which you would like my comments.
Thanks,

Kamal

From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net<mailto:greck@postone.net>>
Date: Saturday, 12 December 2015 at 01:33
To: siqin <siqin@almas.co.jp<mailto:siqin@almas.co.jp>>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: Report on Meeting with Prof. Quejingzhabu
Resent-From: <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Saturday, 12 December 2015 at 01:33

Siqin,
Yes, thank you for the note.
I agree with you totally.
I am working on a new DS01 that incorporates all of these changes from the Hohot Meetings.

Badral, Kamal,
Could I hear from each of you on the notes included in the “Report on Meeting with Prof. Quejingzhabu”?
Thanks,
Greg


From: siqin [mailto:siqin@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 10:33 AM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net<mailto:greck@postone.net>>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Report on Meeting with Prof. Quejingzhabu

Hi Greg,

In Appendix – Isolates,
It is better to have a accusative form of sibe i (185E) like manchu i (1873).

    sibe_accusative_form.png

SiqinBilige.
On 2015/12/06 16:16, Greg Eck wrote:

I am attaching my notes from meetings with Professor Quejingzhabu in Hohot last week. I have had a few days now to process my thoughts from the talks and present in the attached file both the main points that we discussed as well as conclusions drawn. Comments are welcome.



I am suggesting the following action points:



ISOLATES

1.)           Come to agreement on the principles used to select the isolates for non-assigned consonants.  This set of principles will allow us to drive the actual determination of such isolates without bias on any one party’s personal views.

2.)           Given that we come to agreement on #1 above, then we propose the 10 consonantal isolates as listed (blue highlighted items).

3.)           I suggest that we propose the 15 Unicode FVS assignments as shown in the attached chart (grey highlighted items).

4.)           I suggest that we propose the 6 new variants for FVS assignments (yellow highlighted items) as final variants.



FVS MisMatch Situation

1.)           Change the NP such that it does not reflect the FVS Mis-Match change as discussed earlier.



Special Spelling Cases – FYI only

Ligature Discussion – FYI only

Special Letters –  FYI only



Greg