- From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 01:25:39 +0100
- To: "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Hi Greg, On 21.11.2015 16:38, Greg Eck wrote: > Hi Badral, > > No, we don't want to toss the TR170 - it is a masterpiece and matches the MGWBM in most respects except for a few areas as you mention. Good. It's now clear that we hold TR170 and additionally MGWBM. Is it book of Prof. Quejingzhabu? > The sad part of the story is that the MGWBM got more advertisement in the early days and so we end up with the U+1828, U+182D, U+1833 medial defaults as follow the MGWBM instead of the TR170. I don't understand what do you mean by "MGWBM got more advertisement in the early days". When is "in the early days"? I think, it's not right way if we move forward by an advertisement driven approach. I respect Prof. Quejingzhabu and his works. I want to know why he has changed the correct variants. Was it an intention due to technical problems or accidental or some else. Badral > Greg > > Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2015 7:23 PM > Subject: Re: Issues with DA,NA,GA default medial variants > > Please see the chapter "3. The Variant Forms" on page 12-16 just one time again. I already marked some points. We may disregard GA because it is not explicitly defined in the mapping table. DA and NA are already defined explicit. > Should we hold TR170 and correct and improve it or should we blame and refuse and ignore it? > I tend to think, we need to decide now, either we take TR170 or throw it into the bin. > > Badral > -- Badral Sanlig, Software architect www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar
Received on Monday, 23 November 2015 00:26:09 UTC