- From: <jrmt@almas.co.jp>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:47:28 +0900
- To: "'Greg Eck'" <greck@postone.net>, <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <004a01d10fc2$9048feb0$b0dafc10$@almas.co.jp>
Hi Greg, Sorry for my response late. I was trying to confirm this with Professor Shonghor and Professor Batu in Academy of Social Sciences in Inner Mongolia. They are ALI-GALI expert I am referencing. But I was not able to contact in these two days yet. As my memory, it seam there no final form documented for these ALI-GALI characters as well. But I know all of these characters are created by imitating the Mongolian Character U+182B_PA or U+1839_FA or U+182A_BA etc. According to the original character’s writing rule, if these character not defined the final form, we have selected the same tails with the original characters. It will be beatify the Mongolian Script’s writing. If any linguists say the Final form of these characters are same with its Medial form, it is ok to us to follow the opinion. After I have reply from the two experts, let me send to all. Thanks and Best Regards, Jirimutu =============================================================== Almas Inc. 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : 090-6174-6115 Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082 http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com/ http://www.mongolfont.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------- Inner Mongolia Delehi Information Technology Co. Ltd. 010010 13th floor of Uiles Hotel, No 89 XinHua east street XinCheng District, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Mail: jirimutu@delehi.com <mailto:jirimutu@delehi.com> Mobile:18647152148 Phone: +86-471-6661969, Ofiice: +86-471-6661995 http://www.delehi.com/ =============================================================== From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 12:28 PM To: jrmt@almas.co.jp; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org Subject: RE: U+1892/1893 Hi Jirimutu, These are not so important as they are not specified, but can I state for all of these final glyphs in the AliGali (1892/1893/1899/189A/189C/189D/18A2/18A4/18A5/18A8/18AA) something like “Almas uses the common notion that a final has a tail to create the unspecified final”? I just want to make a simple comment as to why the White final glyphs differ from the others. Thanks, Greg From: Greg Eck Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 4:54 PM To: 'jrmt@almas.co.jp' <jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> >; 'public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org' <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > Subject: U+1892/1893 Hi Jirimutu, Do you have any attested examples for the U+1892/1893 final forms with the tail? Thanks, Greg
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Monday, 26 October 2015 07:48:01 UTC