- From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:27:34 +0000
- To: "jrmt@almas.co.jp" <jrmt@almas.co.jp>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 26 October 2015 03:28:07 UTC
Hi Jirimutu, These are not so important as they are not specified, but can I state for all of these final glyphs in the AliGali (1892/1893/1899/189A/189C/189D/18A2/18A4/18A5/18A8/18AA) something like "Almas uses the common notion that a final has a tail to create the unspecified final"? I just want to make a simple comment as to why the White final glyphs differ from the others. Thanks, Greg From: Greg Eck Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 4:54 PM To: 'jrmt@almas.co.jp' <jrmt@almas.co.jp>; 'public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org' <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> Subject: U+1892/1893 Hi Jirimutu, Do you have any attested examples for the U+1892/1893 final forms with the tail? Thanks, Greg [cid:image001.png@01D10F44.7E71B930]
Received on Monday, 26 October 2015 03:28:07 UTC