W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > July to September 2015

FVS Assignment for QA - Final Forms (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch)

From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:35:05 +0000
To: "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN3PR10MB03214220E45152A3D8F3A441AF720@BN3PR10MB0321.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Jirimutu,

Firstly, we do not have the option of going with the “Clean & Simple” column. The archaic forms, such as the U+1820-Second Medial, the U+182C-InitialDotted, the U+182D-InitialUndotted, etc. have been in the documentation from the beginning. So, we do not have that option.

That moves us into the second column of your chart - Complete and Beautiful.

As we are only dealing with the final forms now, I am in agreement with your placement of the undotted final at F+NoFVS and the dotted final at the F+FVS1.

As we are all implementing the undotted final U+182C at the F+NoFVS slot AND the dotted final U+182C at the F+FVS1 slot does anyone have reservations on asking the UTC about moving from the medial specification to the final specification?

Greg
PS You have a mistake in the first column - FINAL Default is listed as ISOLATE Default
PPS Why do you have the final feminine GA listed at F+FVS2?

From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 5:02 PM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: 【Corrected:】 FVS Assignment for QA/GA (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch)

Hi Greg,

I had some mistakes in the table of GA in my document in last mail.
I have corrected it and resent the file again to  forum.

Thanks and Best Regards,


Jirimutu
==========================================================
Almas Inc.
101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>   Mobile : 090-6174-6115
Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082
http://www.almas.co.jp/   http://www.compiere-japan.com/
==========================================================



From: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 5:47 PM
To: 'Greg Eck'; 'public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org'
Subject: FVS Assignment for QA/GA (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch)

Hi Greg,

Let me bring our discussion of the FVS Assignment for QA/GA here.

I have suggested two cleaned up structure for QA/GA in the attached documents.

Please find it and check if it is work or not ?

Thanks and Best Regards,


Jirimutu
==========================================================
Almas Inc.
101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>   Mobile : 090-6174-6115
Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082
http://www.almas.co.jp/   http://www.compiere-japan.com/
==========================================================




From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion.

Let’s go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings at another position.

Greg

Received on Saturday, 8 August 2015 16:36:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:05 UTC