RE: FVS Assignment for QA - Final Forms (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch)

Hi Greg,



> PPS Why do you have the final feminine GA listed at F+FVS2?

My answer form this question is not for the GA. I have answered the final
feminine QA in last mail.



Let me answer this again.

The reason I have listed the final feminine GA listed at F+FVS2 is that I am
trying to make all of the feminine GA not dotted will distinguish by FVS2.

That is

IS + FVS2 of GA is the feminine GA not dotted form,

I + FVS2 of GA is the feminine GA not dotted form,

M + FVS2 of GA is the feminine GA not dotted form,

F + FVS2 of GA is the feminine GA not dotted form



That is all.



Regards,



Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================









From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2015 1:35 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: FVS Assignment for QA - Final Forms (was: New Thread - FVS
Assignment MisMatch)



Jirimutu,



Firstly, we do not have the option of going with the “Clean & Simple”
column. The archaic forms, such as the U+1820-Second Medial, the
U+182C-InitialDotted, the U+182D-InitialUndotted, etc. have been in the
documentation from the beginning. So, we do not have that option.



That moves us into the second column of your chart - Complete and Beautiful.



As we are only dealing with the final forms now, I am in agreement with your
placement of the undotted final at F+NoFVS and the dotted final at the
F+FVS1.



As we are all implementing the undotted final U+182C at the F+NoFVS slot AND
the dotted final U+182C at the F+FVS1 slot does anyone have reservations on
asking the UTC about moving from the medial specification to the final
specification?



Greg

PS You have a mistake in the first column - FINAL Default is listed as
ISOLATE Default

PPS Why do you have the final feminine GA listed at F+FVS2?



From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 5:02 PM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: 【Corrected:】 FVS Assignment for QA/GA (was: New Thread - FVS
Assignment MisMatch)



Hi Greg,



I had some mistakes in the table of GA in my document in last mail.

I have corrected it and resent the file again to  forum.



Thanks and Best Regards,





Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================







From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 5:47 PM
To: 'Greg Eck'; 'public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org'
Subject: FVS Assignment for QA/GA (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment
MisMatch)



Hi Greg,



Let me bring our discussion of the FVS Assignment for QA/GA here.



I have suggested two cleaned up structure for QA/GA in the attached
documents.



Please find it and check if it is work or not ?



Thanks and Best Regards,





Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================









From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch



We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion.



Let’s go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS
assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make
the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings
at another position.



Greg