RE: FVS Assignment for QA - Final Forms (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch)

Hi Greg,



> PS You have a mistake in the first column - FINAL Default is listed as
ISOLATE Default

Yes it is my mistake. After I have copied the row from ISOLATE DEFAULT, I
forgot to update the final one..



> PPS Why do you have the final feminine GA listed at F+FVS2?

In Mongolian there are no real requirements for this.

It is just for structure integrity and the grammar harmony for QA in the
final position in the feminine word.



We can ask other member if we add it or not.

I think if the specification is easy to remember, that will very helpful to
IT guys to work efficiently.



Thanks and Best Regards,





Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================







From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2015 1:35 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: FVS Assignment for QA - Final Forms (was: New Thread - FVS
Assignment MisMatch)



Jirimutu,



Firstly, we do not have the option of going with the “Clean & Simple”
column. The archaic forms, such as the U+1820-Second Medial, the
U+182C-InitialDotted, the U+182D-InitialUndotted, etc. have been in the
documentation from the beginning. So, we do not have that option.



That moves us into the second column of your chart - Complete and Beautiful.



As we are only dealing with the final forms now, I am in agreement with your
placement of the undotted final at F+NoFVS and the dotted final at the
F+FVS1.



As we are all implementing the undotted final U+182C at the F+NoFVS slot AND
the dotted final U+182C at the F+FVS1 slot does anyone have reservations on
asking the UTC about moving from the medial specification to the final
specification?



Greg

PS You have a mistake in the first column - FINAL Default is listed as
ISOLATE Default

PPS Why do you have the final feminine GA listed at F+FVS2?



From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 5:02 PM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: 【Corrected:】 FVS Assignment for QA/GA (was: New Thread - FVS
Assignment MisMatch)



Hi Greg,



I had some mistakes in the table of GA in my document in last mail.

I have corrected it and resent the file again to  forum.



Thanks and Best Regards,





Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================







From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 5:47 PM
To: 'Greg Eck'; 'public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org'
Subject: FVS Assignment for QA/GA (was: New Thread - FVS Assignment
MisMatch)



Hi Greg,



Let me bring our discussion of the FVS Assignment for QA/GA here.



I have suggested two cleaned up structure for QA/GA in the attached
documents.



Please find it and check if it is work or not ?



Thanks and Best Regards,





Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================









From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch



We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion.



Let’s go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS
assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make
the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings
at another position.



Greg