- From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:17:15 +0000
- To: "jrmt@almas.co.jp" <jrmt@almas.co.jp>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BN3PR10MB0321C70519F307D6CFE7CD64AF740@BN3PR10MB0321.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Jirimutu, This is a very interesting paper. I look forward to reading it after the current discussion on the FVS mis-match at 1820,1828,182C,182D,1835,1836. Thanks, Greg From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp] Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 3:33 PM To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org Subject: RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch Hi Greg, I have created the detailed document to explain why we do not agree U1836_YA Medial Variant Selection sequence of New Proposal. This our team's opinion and also represents some users from Inner Mongolia Publishing Group, Inner Mongolia Educational Publishing house. Please find the attached pdf file. I have created one word file actually, but it is exceed the mailbox limitation. I have uploaded the word file to our mail server. Please download it from URL if you need the word file. http://www.mongolfont.com/w3c/U1836_Impact.docx Maybe we can create a new thread to discuss this. Or we can create one thread for each Mongolian Characters. If there is no discussion related characters, we can skip them. I think most of the characters, have a little bit clarification as my investigation. Thanks and Best Regards, Jirimutu ========================================================== Almas Inc. 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : 090-6174-6115 Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082 http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com/ ========================================================== From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion. Let's go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings at another position. Greg
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2015 17:18:34 UTC