Hi Jirimutu,
If we limit our comments to just the 6 FVS assignments, this is what I see ...
* You are in agreement with my suggestions for the suggestions being put before the UTC as outlined in my reponse to Erdenchimeg.
* As to the new variant at U+1820/U+1821-Final swept left with no space - would it be something like the attached? This is the sequence < U+180A >< U+180A ><U+1820> with no MVS included. Would this not do?
* You have further discussion on U+182D - let's wait until we find resolution on the 6 variant FVS assignments first.
* You have further discussion on U+136 - let's wait until we find resolution on the 6 variant FVS assignments first.
Greg
From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 7:01 AM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch
Hi Greg,
I have some inputs in the FVS assignment MisMatch documents.
Thanks and Regards,
Jirimutu
==========================================================
Almas Inc.
101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : 090-6174-6115
Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082
http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com/
==========================================================
From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch
We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion.
Let's go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings at another position.
Greg
