RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

Hi Greg, 

 

I have created the detailed document to explain why we do not agree 

U1836_YA Medial Variant Selection sequence of New Proposal. 

This our team's opinion and also represents some users from  Inner Mongolia
Publishing Group, 

Inner Mongolia Educational Publishing house.

 

Please find the attached pdf file. I have created one word file actually, 

but it is exceed the mailbox limitation.

 

I have uploaded the word file to our mail server. Please download it from
URL if you need the word file.

 

http://www.mongolfont.com/w3c/U1836_Impact.docx

 

Maybe we can create a new thread to discuss this. Or we can create one
thread for each Mongolian Characters. 

If there is no discussion related characters, we can skip them.

I think most of the characters, have a little bit clarification as my
investigation.

 

Thanks and  Best Regards,

 

 

Jirimutu

==========================================================

Almas Inc.

101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

E-Mail:  <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115

Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082

 <http://www.almas.co.jp/> http://www.almas.co.jp/
<http://www.compiere-japan.com/> http://www.compiere-japan.com/

==========================================================

 

 

 

From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

 

We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion. 

 

Let's go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS
assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make
the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings
at another position.

 

Greg