RE: discuss pronunciation registration with i18n?

Hi Dan, 

I'll copy you on our agenda, which includes all the IRC and Zakim goodness.

Please note: the I18N Core WG is a "public" working group. If you need us to be member-only for this discussion, please let me know so that I can make the necessary arrangements.

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Burnett [mailto:dburnett@voxeo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 3:30 PM
> To: Phillips, Addison
> Cc: www-voice@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; mdw@w3.org;
> kazuyuki@w3.org
> Subject: Re: discuss pronunciation registration with i18n?
> 
> Addison, I can join you for your teleconference tomorrow.  If we
> encounter questions I cannot answer without recourse to other group
> members we can arrange a follow-up meeting.
> 
> Can you please send me email directly with your zakim code?
> 
> -- dan
> 
> On Jan 12, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> 
> > Hello Daniel (et al),
> >
> > I am writing on behalf of the I18N Core WG. We recently have
> > received a number in inquiries about an IETF Internet-Draft
> prepared
> > by members of your WG and related to work on SSML and PLS. This
> is
> > draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.
> >
> > There is some concern in the Language Tagging and I18N
> communities
> > that your approach to identifying pronunciation alphabets might
> not
> > be the best choice for future needs of your users or for
> language/
> > pronunciation identification. The thought is that the attribute
> you
> > use for pronunciation alphabet maybe should use a language tag
> and
> > that your registry should be an extension of BCP 47 language tags.
> >
> > You and I reviewed this together during TPAC and I think I
> > understand the reasons for the approach your WG choose. However,
> we
> > would like to ensure that the I18N WG understands and documents
> your
> > reasons well and the WG as a whole would like to consider whether
> we
> > would recommend something different. As a result, I have been
> asked
> > to invite you and/or appropriate representatives of your WG to
> meet
> > with us in one of our upcoming teleconferences or at some
> mutually
> > agreeable time.
> >
> > Or next teleconference is tomorrow, Wednesday, 13 January, at
> 17:30
> > UTC (12:30 Boston, 9:30 San Francisco). If this is not convenient
> (I
> > realize this is late notice), we could also meet next week or at
> > some other time, if you'd care to propose it.
> >
> > Please advise as to your availability and whether you have any
> > comments/concerns/questions I can help prep you with.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Addison (for I18N Core WG)
> >
> > Addison Phillips
> > Globalization Architect -- Lab126
> >
> > Internationalization is not a feature.
> > It is an architecture.
> >
> >

Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2010 23:51:32 UTC