RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Sub-elements for example

Hi Paolo,

The i18n Core WG is satisfied with this resolution.

Thanks,
RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Baggia Paolo [mailto:paolo.baggia@loquendo.com] 
> Sent: 08 January 2007 09:11
> To: Richard Ishida
> Cc: Baggia Paolo; public-i18n-core@w3.org; www-voice@w3.org
> Subject: R: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Sub-elements for example
> 
> R103-30 : Sub-elements for example
> 
>     Recent discussion:
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006OctDec/0097.html
>     
>     Resolution: Deferred
> 
> We now understand your motivation better. We will consider 
> your request in a future version of PLS, but we wouldn't 
> apply it now because the spec is a second Last Call Working Draft.
> 
> ~~~~~
> Please indicate before 24 January 2007 whether you are 
> satisfied with the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there 
> has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register 
> an objection.
> 
> If you do not think you can respond before 24 January, please 
> let me know. However, if we do not hear from you at all by 24 
> January 2007,
> we will assume that you accept our resolutions.	
> ~~~~~
> 	
> Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.
> 
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org]
> Inviato: venerd́ 15 dicembre 2006 15.22
> A: Baggia Paolo; www-voice@w3.org
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Oggetto: RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Sub-elements for example
> 
> > > R103-30:
> > > Resolution: Rejected
> > > 
> > > - You asked to add markup in the example element.
> > > - We rejected it with motivations.
> > > - No answer
> > > 
> > > + E-mail Trail
> > > - Original Comment Richard Ishida (2006-03-21)
> > >   
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JanMar/0089.html
> > > - VBWG official response to last call issue VBWG (2006-05-26)
> > >   
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006AprJun/0075.html
> 
> 
> 
> The i18n WG still feels that markup would be better for bidi 
> text than Unicode control codes, but we will not insist on 
> this if it will force you back to WD.
> 
> Reasons we prefer markup include:
> 
> 1. start and end markers are visible, which decreases the 
> likelihood of errors
> 
> 2. correct application of bidi information can be checked as 
> part of the well-formedness and validation checks on the document
> 
> 3. the scope of the embeddings is easier to manage (eg. if a 
> PDF control is omitted after an RLE, it is not clear in 
> marked up content where the embedded directionality should 
> terminate - markup makes that clear).
> 
> 
> RI
>  
> 
> 
> ============
> Richard Ishida
> Internationalization Lead
> W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
> http://www.w3.org/International/
> http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
> 
> 
> 
> Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom 
> Italia S.p.A.
> 
> ================================================
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the 
> persons above and may contain confidential information. If 
> you have received the message in error, be informed that any 
> use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it 
> immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you 
> have any questions, please send an e_mail to 
> <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it.
>  Thank you<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
> ================================================
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.17/661 - Release Date: 30/01/2007
23:30

Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 13:29:25 UTC