RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language

Hi Paolo,

The I18n Core WG is satisfied by this course of action.

Thank you,
RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Baggia Paolo [mailto:paolo.baggia@loquendo.com] 
> Sent: 08 January 2007 09:10
> To: Richard Ishida
> Cc: Baggia Paolo; public-i18n-core@w3.org; www-voice@w3.org
> Subject: R: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language
> 
> R103-21 : dc:language
> 
>     Recent discussion:
>     
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006OctDec/0092.html 
> 
>     Resolution: Accepted
>     
> We will remove dc:language from the example in Section 4.3 [1].
> 
> ~~~~~
> Please indicate before 24 January 2007 whether you are 
> satisfied with the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there 
> has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register 
> an objection.
> 
> If you do not think you can respond before 24 January, please 
> let me know. However, if we do not hear from you at all by 24 
> January 2007,
> we will assume that you accept our resolutions.	
> ~~~~~
> 	
> Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20061026/#S4.3
> 
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org]
> Inviato: venerd́ 15 dicembre 2006 14.38
> A: Baggia Paolo; www-voice@w3.org
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Oggetto: RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language
> 
> > > R103-21:
> > > Resolution: Rejected
> > > 
> > > - Request: "How is dc:language="en-US" meant to be interpreted
> > >   if it appears in a metadata element? How does it affect
> > >   the xml:lang declaration on PLS elements?"
> > > - We rejected it, because: "We do not see any relationship
> > >   between the two declarations. The attribute xml:lang is
> > >   mandatory in PLS and dc:language will be ignored."
> > > - No answer
> > > 
> > > + E-mail Trail
> > > - Original Comment Richard Ishida (2006-03-21)
> > >   
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JanMar/0080.html
> > > - VBWG official response to last call issue VBWG (2006-05-26)
> > >   
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006AprJun/0070.html
> 
> 
> 
> The i18n WG feels that it will be confusing to people to see 
> the dc:language
> declaration in the example, and that one of two things should 
> therefore
> happen:
> 
> 1. remove the dc:language line from the example
> 
> 2. explain in the text that it is not clear what is the 
> likely effect of
> including dc:language as shown, nor how that information 
> should relate to
> the xml:lang attribute.
> 
> Cheers,
> RI
> 
> 
> ============
> Richard Ishida
> Internationalization Lead
> W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
> http://www.w3.org/International/
> http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
> 
> 
> 
> Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom 
> Italia S.p.A.
> 
> ================================================
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the 
> persons above and may contain confidential information. If 
> you have received the message in error, be informed that any 
> use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it 
> immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you 
> have any questions, please send an e_mail to 
> <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it.
>  Thank you<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
> ================================================
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.17/661 - Release Date: 30/01/2007
23:30

Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 13:28:25 UTC