- From: Reinier Kaper <rp.kaper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:49:14 -0500
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAz96OvMPVMsLnSVe23Q1t-tWknSnP923=S7o_sb5h59tookYw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Steve, Yes as long as not the whole label becomes an anchor, it's still fully functional. Maybe disallowing that case is a good idea, but I don't really see the advantage of doing that, unless there's solid data that suggests that this happens a lot and interferes with (for example) AT and screen-readers. Kind regards, Reinier Kaper On 13 January 2014 11:42, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > checked the code you provided: > > > <label> > <input type="checkbox" /> > I agree to the <a href="tos.html">terms of service</a> for using this > product. > </label> > > for the non link text the control can still be activated, so maybe only > needs to restrict case where label text is wholly contained with a link: > > > <label> > <input type="checkbox" /> > <a href="tos.html">I agree to the terms of service for using this product. > </label></a> > > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> > > > On 13 January 2014 14:43, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> >> >> >> On 13 January 2014 14:34, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>wrote: >> >>> > do you know of any use cases for including links in label elements? >>> >>> Although it's certainly not the best user experience, I've seen many >>> terms-of-service checkboxes with links to the terms of service. E.g. >>> >>> <label> >>> <input type="checkbox" /> >>> I agree to the <a href="tos.html">terms of service</a> for using this >>> product. >>> </label> >>> >> >> is this a use case that we want to continue to encourage/allow? >> >>> >>> I imagine if I poked around the sites I used I'd be able to turn up >>> quite a few URLs illustrating this. >>> >> >> would be useful to have some data, will dig. >> >> >
Received on Monday, 13 January 2014 16:49:44 UTC