- From: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 15:07:01 +0000
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: Reinier Kaper <rp.kaper@gmail.com>, JF <john@foliot.ca>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
> From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 10:53 AM > > Hi Adrian, > OK, so are you saying as I think Jukka was also, that no > special markup is needed to identify changes/additional text > added inline to quoted text? Yes. > The conventional means using brackets, explanatory text, > quotation marks etc is adequate? For my needs as a blogger, sometimes paid writer, and general reader (but by no means professional, trained author/journalist), yes. > I am OK with that, I am just trying to explore what ways that > existing markup could be used to to disambigaute inline notes > etc from the quoted text. I think <mark> can serve that role, but I don't immediately see how authors will work into a workflow/process that doesn't seem to use it now, nor how they can do it and make it accessible. To be fair, I did not wade through the giant collection of sites you have made available to see how often <mark> is used Weekend laziness and all...
Received on Sunday, 8 September 2013 15:07:28 UTC