- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:26:28 +0200
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Daniel Glazman, Sat, 19 May 2012 09:01:56 +0200: > Le 18/05/12 23:10, Leif Halvard Silli a écrit : > >> It is not the dream answer, since you offer no proof that the negative >> effect *happens*. But if you have proof that some of your users would >> start to remove the meta generator because of its effect on the >> validator, then it would be a dream answer. >> >> Another proof of negative effect could be someone who chose to publish >> as HTML4 instead of HTML5 (BlueGriffon offers both options) just >> because image validation is poorer - and different - for HTML5 than for >> HTML4 ... > > A proof of something that is only recently specified and not implemented > by any editing tool yet? You're serious? Indeed, since this is what I understand the co-chairs would like to see. However, I agree that it is difficult to document *now* - and *later* too. -- Leif H Silli
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 12:27:04 UTC