Re: Issue 31c: Meta generator

Daniel Glazman, Sat, 19 May 2012 09:01:56 +0200:
> Le 18/05/12 23:10, Leif Halvard Silli a écrit :
> 
>> It is not the dream answer, since you offer no proof that the negative
>> effect *happens*. But if you have proof that some of your users would
>> start to remove the meta generator because of its effect on the
>> validator, then it would be a dream answer.
>> 
>> Another proof of negative effect could be someone who chose to publish
>> as HTML4 instead of HTML5 (BlueGriffon offers both options) just
>> because image validation is poorer - and different - for HTML5 than for
>> HTML4 ...
> 
> A proof of something that is only recently specified and not implemented
> by any editing tool yet? You're serious?

Indeed, since this is what I understand the co-chairs would like to 
see. However, I agree that it is difficult to document *now* - and 
*later* too.
-- 
Leif H Silli

Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 12:27:04 UTC