- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 15:12:07 +0200
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Le 19/05/12 14:26, Leif Halvard Silli a écrit : >> A proof of something that is only recently specified and not implemented >> by any editing tool yet? You're serious? > > Indeed, since this is what I understand the co-chairs would like to > see. However, I agree that it is difficult to document *now* - and > *later* too. "difficult" is really a bit of an euphemism here. Asking for a proof or metrics for something totally new, never implemented, implementing a change potentially impacting a rather larger variety of tools and users is not only pointless, but shows a seriously flawed process. We have: 1. common practice (the meta generator is only used for marketing) 2. impact on editing tools and filters (I suspect none will change or only a minority and I suspect you'll never really know) 3. impact on web authors (most won't care IMHO) 4. impact on users (that's where there's a disagreement AFAIU) That's all we have. No evidences, no metrics, just thoughts, nothing more. </Daniel>
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 13:12:44 UTC