- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:01:56 +0200
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Le 18/05/12 23:10, Leif Halvard Silli a écrit : > It is not the dream answer, since you offer no proof that the negative > effect *happens*. But if you have proof that some of your users would > start to remove the meta generator because of its effect on the > validator, then it would be a dream answer. > > Another proof of negative effect could be someone who chose to publish > as HTML4 instead of HTML5 (BlueGriffon offers both options) just > because image validation is poorer - and different - for HTML5 than for > HTML4 ... A proof of something that is only recently specified and not implemented by any editing tool yet? You're serious? </Daniel>
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 07:02:22 UTC