- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:42:36 -0400
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
On 06/08/2012 01:00 PM, Janina Sajka wrote: > Sam Ruby writes: >> On 06/08/2012 12:50 PM, Janina Sajka wrote: >>> I am perplexed and disappointed that my direct appeal is >>> now diverted. >> >> Per Judy's request, I will not interrupt further. You are welcome >> to proceed. Meanwhile, please let me know a deadline by which you >> will commit to completing your efforts in this area. >> > Thanks for that, Sam. But, how do you propose to undo the diversion > introduced here since I first posed my question last night? It's no > longer the same playing field. What do you suggest? Jonas has already responded once: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012May/0159.html Your reply to Jonas response did not pose any new questions, nor did it attempt to address his concerns: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jun/0000.html Your question last night seems to simply be a reiteration of your previous position, which Jonas already responded to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jun/0050.html Unless you have additional avenues that you would like to pursue, or we hear from Jonas or others that there is indeed something new in this discussion that merits consideration, we seem to be in a position where dissent remains and it is time to move on to the next step. Forgive me if it feels like I am hurrying you along. But what I am specifically looking for here is something new that has yet to be discussed. > Janina - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 17:43:06 UTC